Apps

Speed Reading Apps: Do They Work, and How to Pick the Best One

Abdullah YılmazUpdated:

The short answer

No app is best for everyone. Choose one that checks your comprehension after every drill, lets you set the pace, works on texts you pick and promises nothing like 1,000 words per minute with full comprehension. Word-by-word (RSVP) apps make useful drills, but at 700 and 1,000 words per minute people understood normal text better (Acklin & Papesh, 2017).

  1. Take a reading speed test that checks comprehension, so you know where you start.
  2. Try a free word-by-word reader on a text you need to read anyway.
  3. Pick an app that quizzes you after each drill and lets you set the pace.
  4. Retest every few weeks on a new text, and keep the pace where you still get 70% right.

⚡ Try it now

Words at a time

Space: play/pause · ← →: sentence back/forward · tap the word to pause ·

What kinds of speed reading apps are there?

Most apps are one of four kinds, or a mix. RSVP (rapid serial visual presentation) flashes one word, or a short group, at a time in a single spot, so your eyes stay still. A pacer is a highlight that moves through ordinary text at a speed you set.

Kind of app What it does What the research says
RSVP (word-by-word) reader Shows one word or a short group at a time in a fixed spot Like normal reading at normal speeds; faster means less comprehension (Rayner et al., 2016)
Pacer or guided reading Moves a highlight through normal text No controlled studies we know of; you keep the page and can look back
Course and drills Lessons, timed drills and quizzes Courses can raise speed, but comprehension tends to slip (Rayner et al., 2016)
Eye exercises and attention games Schulte tables, eye-movement drills No study we found shows they make you read faster

Do speed reading apps work?

As practice, they can help. As a way to read, the evidence is weak, especially for RSVP readers, the kind researchers have tested most.

  • Passages. In studies summarised by Rayner et al. (2016), RSVP matched normal reading at about 200 words per minute. At 400 and 600, readers still caught the topic but recalled fewer details, and removing the pauses between sentences made comprehension worse.
  • App speeds. At 700 and 1,000 words per minute, readers understood static text better than RSVP, on texts at 6th- and 12th-grade level (Acklin & Papesh, 2017).
  • Spritz. People who read a novel chapter with Spritz for more than 20 minutes were no faster than on paper (about 200 words per minute either way), reported more eye fatigue and recalled fewer literal details (Benedetto et al., 2015).

Part of the reason: word-by-word display takes away your look-backs. Skilled readers look back on 10–15% of their eye movements (Rayner, 2009), and blocking them lowers comprehension (Schotter et al., 2014). Nor do eye movements eat most of your reading time, as Spritz was quoted claiming (80%); the review puts it at about 10% (Rayner et al., 2016). So an RSVP app makes a good drill, but a faster pace only counts if it survives a comprehension check.

How do you choose the best speed reading app?

Use this checklist on any app, ours included.

  1. A comprehension check after every drill. A classic study of more than 12,000 readers counted a reading rate only when at least 70% of the answers were right (Brysbaert, 2019). The questions should need the text: in one course study, people who never saw the passage still got 57% of its non-fiction questions right (Rayner et al., 2016).
  2. A pace you control. Start near your own speed and step up slowly; comprehension holds best near normal rates.
  3. Pauses and a way back. A pause at each sentence end and a button that jumps back a sentence both protect comprehension.
  4. Real texts you choose. Pasting an article you need anyway shows whether the pace carries over. Measure progress on a new text each time; reused texts have inflated course results before (Rayner et al., 2016).
  5. A practice plan and a streak. Gains from practice are real but slow (Rayner et al., 2016). A plan and a streak help you show up; they are not proof that you improved.
  6. Honest claims. Be wary of “1,000 words per minute with full comprehension”, promises to double or triple your speed, and eye exercises sold as speed boosters. When 16 strong readers, including self-described speed readers, were tested, comprehension dropped sharply above about 600 words per minute (Carver, 1985).

Is there a free speed reading app?

Yes. Many speed reading apps are free to download, with optional subscriptions, so price rarely decides it. Before you pay, check that the free part already tests your comprehension, on iPhone or Android alike.

Where does Speed Readingo fit?

Speed Readingo is our app: we make it and this site, so read this as a description, not a review. It runs on iPhone and Android and is free to download, with an optional Premium subscription inside the app. It has a lesson path, RSVP drills up to 1,200 words per minute, Schulte tables, memory games, a daily streak and comprehension checks, in English, Turkish, Spanish, Portuguese and German.

The top RSVP speeds are drill paces, like a heavier weight in the gym, not speeds at which you catch every detail: the studies above show comprehension falling well before 1,200. The Schulte table is an attention game; we do not claim it speeds up reading. Judge the app by the same checklist.

Try before you install

These are free and run in your browser:

  • The drill at the top of this page flashes words at 300 per minute, the top of the range at which most adults read English non-fiction (Brysbaert, 2019).
  • The RSVP reader plays any text you paste at 100 to 1,000 words per minute, with pauses at sentence ends.
  • The reading speed test shows your speed next to your comprehension.
  • The speed reading exercises add a pacer, word groups and the Schulte table, with a 10-minute daily plan.

If these give you what you need, you may not need an app at all.

Next: does speed reading work? What the research says.

Read next: Speed reading techniques that work · How to remember what you read.

Questions people ask

Do speed reading apps work?

As practice, they can help: they hold you to a pace. As a way to read, the evidence is weak. At 700 and 1,000 words per minute, people understood static text better than word-by-word display (Acklin & Papesh, 2017), and readers using Spritz were no faster than on paper and reported more eye fatigue (Benedetto et al., 2015).

What is the best free speed reading app?

Many speed reading apps are free to download, with optional subscriptions, so price rarely decides it. The best one for you checks comprehension after every drill and lets you set the pace. You can also try the free tools on this site in your browser before you install anything.

Which speed reading app should I use on iPhone or Android?

The checklist is the same on both: comprehension checks, a pace you control, your own texts and honest claims. Speed Readingo, the app we make, is on iPhone and Android; judge it by the same checklist.

Can an app teach me to read 1,000 words per minute?

An app can show you words that fast, but not with good comprehension. When 16 strong readers, including self-described speed readers, were tested, comprehension dropped sharply above about 600 words per minute (Carver, 1985).

Sources

  1. Acklin, D., & Papesh, M. H. (2017). Modern speed-reading apps do not foster reading comprehension. American Journal of Psychology, 130(2), 183–199.
  2. Benedetto, S., Carbone, A., Pedrotti, M., Le Fevre, K., Bey, L. A. Y., & Baccino, T. (2015). Rapid serial visual presentation in reading: The case of Spritz. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 352–358.
  3. Rayner, K., Schotter, E. R., Masson, M. E. J., Potter, M. C., & Treiman, R. (2016). So much to read, so little time: How do we read, and can speed reading help?. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(1), 4–34.
  4. Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506.
  5. Schotter, E. R., Tran, R., & Rayner, K. (2014). Don’t believe what you read (only once): Comprehension is supported by regressions during reading. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1218–1226.
  6. Brysbaert, M. (2019). How many words do we read per minute? A review and meta-analysis of reading rate. Journal of Memory and Language, 109, 104047.
  7. Carver, R. P. (1985). How good are some of the world’s best readers?. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(4), 389–419.
Cite / link to this page

Ready-made lines for a reading list, a paper or your own site. Copy the format you need.

HTML link
<a href="https://speedreadingo.fastemy.com/guides/speed-reading-apps/">Speed Reading Apps: Do They Work, and How to Pick the Best One</a>
APA 7

Yılmaz, A. (2026, November 5). Speed Reading Apps: Do They Work, and How to Pick the Best One. Speed Readingo. https://speedreadingo.fastemy.com/guides/speed-reading-apps/

MLA 9

Yılmaz, Abdullah. “Speed Reading Apps: Do They Work, and How to Pick the Best One.” Speed Readingo, Fastemy, 5 Nov. 2026, speedreadingo.fastemy.com/guides/speed-reading-apps/.

Abdullah Yılmaz

Written by

Abdullah Yılmaz · Speed reading instructor · Founder of Fastemy

Abdullah Yılmaz built Speed Readingo and teaches speed reading and memory techniques. His Turkish course on Udemy has taught more than 49,000 students since 2018, with a 4.6 rating from over 10,500 reviews. The lessons on this site follow the same method, adapted for the web and for the app.

Udemy course: Speed Reading Techniques & Memory: Learn Like a Genius (49,126 · 4.6★) · About the author and the method